Banned Books - Part 1
"Swimming pools can be dangerous for children. To protect them, one can install locks, put up fences, and deploy pool alarms. All these measures are helpful, but by far the most important thing one can do for one's children is to teach them to swim." (emphasis mine) ~National Research Council, Youth, Pornography and the Internet
Dare I make the obvious connection? There is a lot of stuff out there that is unsuitable for certain age groups. We can--and should--protect our children from exploitive things such as pornography, violence and a host of other things. But the best thing we can do is to teach our children to think.
(And let me add a parenthetical here. Some people argue there is material out there that's unsuitable for any age group. To them I say--don't frickin' tell me what I can and cannot read/watch/listen to. If something comes up that I find offensive, I'll stop reading/watching/listening. But it's my choice. Not yours.)
What does banning books solve other than to take away one of our most basic liberties? The freedom to say/think/write what we want?
Hey, let's just do away with democracy and establish the Thought Police. Then we can all say the same things, do the same things, think the same things, be the same things.
"BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU, the caption said, while the dark eyes looked deep into Winston's own. Down at street level another poster, torn at one corner, flapped fitfully in the wind, alternately covering and uncovering the single word INGSOC. In the far distance a helicopter skimmed down between the roofs, hovered for an instant like a bluebottle, and darted away again with a curving flight. It was the Police Patrol, snooping into people's windows. The patrols did not matter, however. Only the Thought Police mattered." ~George Orwell, 1984
6 comments:
Emma, that's what I'm saying about the books--what do people want? To keep kids in the dark about their bodies and how they work? Why they have the feelings and urges they do? Phffft.
And you're right. Kicking up a fuss draws more attention to it and makes people want to see what it's all about. :)
This brings to mind a point that's really been bugging me lately. People in the south always fuss about certain books (such as the ones we write, lol) being pornographic, yet they feel perfectly fine dressing their six year olds up in pageant makeup, bikinis, and fake hair, and teaching them to wiggle to "I'm a Barbie Girl". So...I'm getting from them that it's cool to sexualize children, but not to write about two fictional consenting adults having sex. EWww.....I mean, ewww. Right?
Now, Anna, they're just little girls playing dress up, right? It's the sicko perverts lusting after them that's the problem, not that our children are parading around in heels and makeup...
There's some truth to both parts of that statement, but if we had our little girls just be little girls...
As you say, ewwwww.
Let children be children - they'll grow up soon enough and try and take our fun away, anyway! lol
On a more serious note - burning books is like trying to kill a rose bush by cutting off one bloom - the root and stem are still there - more will follow!
(Thank God!)
This is for you ladies of Eros, from the blog of Paperback Writer -
"Ten Things I'd Like to Read
3. Explicit erotica that does not attempt to apologize for being explicit by inventing ridiculous excuses for any erotic act in the book"
Viva la art érotique!
http://pbackwriter.blogspot.com/2006/09/wish-ten.html
Sam, yeah, look how well the book burnings in Nazi Germany went. Thanks for the link to the blog, guy. :)
Post a Comment